PS 111 SETON FALLS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

131

43%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

129

45%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

76

47%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

68

44%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

55

39%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

61

47%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

61
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

68

38%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

73

41%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

58

54%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

54

55%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

59

29%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

68

33%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

72

73%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

61

76%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

84
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

119

43%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

70

25%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

61
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

119

43%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

12

43%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

123

45%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

116

46%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

83
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

114

42%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

54
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

109

44%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

17

55%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

20

54%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.