Skip to Content
Main content

IN-TECH ACADEMY (MS/HS 368) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

161

50%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

147

47%

LEVEL 2

71

23%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

71

46%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

60

43%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

90

54%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

87

50%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

14

56%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

146

53%

LEVEL 2

62

22%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

124

46%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

113

44%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

110

43%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

48

80%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

37

66%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

84
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

96

39%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

90
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

80

34%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

65

89%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

67

83%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

143

53%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

134

48%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

126

48%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

75
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

110

45%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

35

63%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

37

56%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.