Skip to Content
Main content

MS 390 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

256

51%

LEVEL 2

135

27%

LEVEL 3

75

15%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

239

48%

LEVEL 2

128

26%

LEVEL 3

78

16%

LEVEL 4

56

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

116

51%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

107

46%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

140

51%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

132

50%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

38

57%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

36

55%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

216

50%

LEVEL 2

120

28%

LEVEL 3

65

15%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

112
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

198

46%

LEVEL 2

116

27%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

177

44%

LEVEL 2

120

30%

LEVEL 3

71

17%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

162

40%

LEVEL 2

112

28%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

79

80%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

77

78%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

109
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

137

39%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

130
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

127

35%

LEVEL 2

104

29%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

119

79%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

112

80%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

251

51%

LEVEL 2

133

27%

LEVEL 3

73

15%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

233

49%

LEVEL 2

122

25%

LEVEL 3

71

15%

LEVEL 4

53

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

156

47%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

102
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

151

43%

LEVEL 2

98

28%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

100

57%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

88

59%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.