PS 340 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

120

42%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

100

36%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

47

36%

LEVEL 2

52

40%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

50

37%

LEVEL 2

50

37%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

73

47%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

107

44%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

88

37%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

67

33%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

60

30%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

53

67%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

40

53%

LEVEL 2

28

37%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

71

35%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

66
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

54

27%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

49

61%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

46

60%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

110

43%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

89

38%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

64
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

82

38%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

56
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

66

33%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

38

54%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

34

43%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.