Skip to Content
Main content

IS 254 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

221

54%

LEVEL 2

109

26%

LEVEL 3

63

15%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

230

49%

LEVEL 2

142

30%

LEVEL 3

67

14%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

97

48%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

111

47%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

124

58%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

119

51%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

34

46%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

33

43%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

180

56%

LEVEL 2

84

26%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

192

50%

LEVEL 2

115

30%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

134

44%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

146

43%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

87

81%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

84

65%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

74
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

130

46%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

83
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

111

38%

LEVEL 2

96

33%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

91

71%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

119

65%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

16

40%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

16

34%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

205

55%

LEVEL 2

100

27%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

214

50%

LEVEL 2

125

29%

LEVEL 3

58

14%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

170

51%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

173

46%

LEVEL 2

119

32%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

51

62%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

57

60%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.