Skip to Content
Main content

PS 91 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

167

47%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

54

15%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

133

39%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

83

47%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

70

40%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

84

48%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

63

38%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

6

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

32

50%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

20

37%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

124

48%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

106

41%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

113

41%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

83

31%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

54

69%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

50

68%

LEVEL 2

16

22%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

75
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

87

37%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

66

29%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

80

68%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

67

59%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

159

48%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

129

39%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

102

44%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

85

38%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

65

54%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

48

41%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.