Skip to Content
Main content

PS 94 KINGS COLLEGE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

329

58%

LEVEL 2

154

27%

LEVEL 3

67

12%

LEVEL 4

14

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

320

57%

LEVEL 2

158

28%

LEVEL 3

67

12%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

162

58%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

158

56%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

167

59%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

162

59%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

21

35%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

56

58%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

58

62%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

233

62%

LEVEL 2

99

26%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

233

61%

LEVEL 2

109

28%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

217

50%

LEVEL 2

143

33%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

215

50%

LEVEL 2

140

32%

LEVEL 3

63

15%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

112

89%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

105

82%

LEVEL 2

18

14%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

72
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

200

51%

LEVEL 2

122

31%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

189

49%

LEVEL 2

123

32%

LEVEL 3

63

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

129

76%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

131

77%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

16

52%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

14

39%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

313

59%

LEVEL 2

143

27%

LEVEL 3

64

12%

LEVEL 4

13

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

306

59%

LEVEL 2

145

28%

LEVEL 3

60

11%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

261

56%

LEVEL 2

135

29%

LEVEL 3

60

13%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

256

55%

LEVEL 2

135

29%

LEVEL 3

61

13%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

68

70%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

64

66%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.