Skip to Content
Main content

PS 205 FIORELLO LAGUARDIA GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

229

45%

LEVEL 2

151

29%

LEVEL 3

103

20%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

157

32%

LEVEL 2

148

30%

LEVEL 3

120

25%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

128

47%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

78

29%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

101

42%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

79

36%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

7

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

34

55%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

34

49%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

104
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

182

44%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

142
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

119

31%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

163

40%

LEVEL 2

127

31%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

109

28%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

58

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

66

62%

LEVEL 2

24

22%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

48

50%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

127
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

146

37%

LEVEL 2

118

30%

LEVEL 3

98

25%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

173
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

96

25%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

83

67%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

61

57%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

13

27%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

11

21%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

12

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

216

46%

LEVEL 2

136

29%

LEVEL 3

88

19%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

146

33%

LEVEL 2

134

31%

LEVEL 3

105

24%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

124
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

188

42%

LEVEL 2

131

30%

LEVEL 3

93

21%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

168
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

129

30%

LEVEL 2

130

30%

LEVEL 3

109

26%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

41

58%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

28

46%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.