Skip to Content
Main content

IS 206 ANN MERSEREAU GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

109

61%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

110

51%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

51

59%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

53

48%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

58

62%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

57

54%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

17

71%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

92

62%

LEVEL 2

37

25%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

88

48%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

60

49%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

70

41%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

49

86%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

40

83%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

23
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

69

55%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

47
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

62

45%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

40

75%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

48

61%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

102

63%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

107

53%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

83

62%

LEVEL 2

30

22%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

48
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

80

48%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

26

58%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

30

58%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.