Skip to Content
Main content

PS 81 ROBERT J CHRISTEN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

53

21%

LEVEL 3

94

37%

LEVEL 4

79

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

99

35%

LEVEL 4

94

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

49

37%

LEVEL 4

41

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

49

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

45

37%

LEVEL 4

38

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

24

16%

LEVEL 3

60

41%

LEVEL 4

45

31%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

11

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

28

36%

LEVEL 4

39

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

25

31%

LEVEL 4

37

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

11

46%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

14

48%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

31

25%

LEVEL 3

45

37%

LEVEL 4

29

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

88
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

39

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

84

37%

LEVEL 4

77

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

92

37%

LEVEL 4

88

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

168
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

50

21%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

78

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

187
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

53

20%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

92

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

55

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

69

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

44

39%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

167
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

50

21%

LEVEL 3

91

38%

LEVEL 4

76

32%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

187
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

48

18%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

93

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.