THOMAS C GIORDANO MS 45 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

393

63%

LEVEL 2

180

29%

LEVEL 3

42

7%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

406

65%

LEVEL 2

148

24%

LEVEL 3

56

9%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

177

58%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

22

7%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

188

60%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

216

68%

LEVEL 2

78

24%

LEVEL 3

20

6%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

218

69%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

75

71%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

76

73%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

293

62%

LEVEL 2

142

30%

LEVEL 3

33

7%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

312

63%

LEVEL 2

123

25%

LEVEL 3

45

9%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

295

58%

LEVEL 2

164

32%

LEVEL 3

40

8%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

310

60%

LEVEL 2

133

26%

LEVEL 3

55

11%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

98

84%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

96

86%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

50
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

275

57%

LEVEL 2

158

33%

LEVEL 3

40

8%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

69
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

284

58%

LEVEL 2

135

28%

LEVEL 3

52

11%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

118

83%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

122

87%

LEVEL 2

13

9%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

387

63%

LEVEL 2

173

28%

LEVEL 3

40

7%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

393

65%

LEVEL 2

140

23%

LEVEL 3

53

9%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

39
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

326

62%

LEVEL 2

164

31%

LEVEL 3

34

6%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

329

63%

LEVEL 2

127

24%

LEVEL 3

54

10%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

67

70%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

77

75%

LEVEL 2

21

21%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.