Skip to Content
Main content

PS 46 EDGAR ALLAN POE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

247

53%

LEVEL 2

120

26%

LEVEL 3

62

13%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

195

47%

LEVEL 2

108

26%

LEVEL 3

67

16%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

116

51%

LEVEL 2

57

25%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

94

47%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

131

55%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

101

47%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

32

48%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

24

42%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

208

55%

LEVEL 2

94

25%

LEVEL 3

48

13%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

166

49%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

141

41%

LEVEL 2

106

31%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

118

38%

LEVEL 2

87

28%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

106

84%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

77

71%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

80
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

114

41%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

100
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

94

37%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

133

70%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

101

63%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

8

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

232

54%

LEVEL 2

113

26%

LEVEL 3

57

13%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

186

49%

LEVEL 2

99

26%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

186

53%

LEVEL 2

82

24%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

89
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

131

43%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

61

51%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

64

57%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.