Skip to Content
Main content

MILTON FEIN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

135

28%

LEVEL 2

103

21%

LEVEL 3

111

23%

LEVEL 4

139

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

101

24%

LEVEL 2

107

26%

LEVEL 3

75

18%

LEVEL 4

131

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

69

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

69

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

67

28%

LEVEL 2

44

18%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

70

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

62

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

15

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

13

54%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

12

57%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

191
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

122

30%

LEVEL 2

93

23%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

94

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

154
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

94

27%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

91

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

89

21%

LEVEL 2

92

22%

LEVEL 3

104

25%

LEVEL 4

134

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

129

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

46

67%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

25

53%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

233
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

64

17%

LEVEL 2

77

21%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

136

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

191
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

59

18%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

128

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

71

62%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

42

46%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

36

49%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

14

19%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

39

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

122

29%

LEVEL 2

91

22%

LEVEL 3

99

24%

LEVEL 4

103

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

87

26%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

92

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

208
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

94

24%

LEVEL 2

87

22%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

120

31%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

168
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

69

21%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

107

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

42
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

41

41%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

38
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

32

36%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

24

27%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.