Skip to Content
Main content

PS 9 RYER AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

187

48%

LEVEL 2

106

27%

LEVEL 3

63

16%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

135

33%

LEVEL 2

137

34%

LEVEL 3

81

20%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

79

43%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

68

33%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

108

53%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

67

33%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

27

51%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

20

36%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

156

48%

LEVEL 2

94

29%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

109
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

113

33%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

120

40%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

88

28%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

67

74%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

47

51%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

85
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

99

38%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

115
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

70

26%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

88

68%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

65

47%

LEVEL 2

53

38%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

175

49%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

129

35%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

134

50%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

103
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

89

31%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

53

44%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

46

39%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.