Skip to Content
Main content

PS 15 INST FOR ENVIRON LRNG GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

91

29%

LEVEL 3

98

32%

LEVEL 4

74

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

60

20%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

80

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

64

36%

LEVEL 4

39

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

51

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

27

20%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

35

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

34

26%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

29

22%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

153
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

68

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

151
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

77

29%

LEVEL 4

74

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

69

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

77

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

24

43%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

28

48%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

168
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

73

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

171
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

72

24%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

80

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

23

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

24

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

51

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

51

21%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

56

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

66

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

152
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

65

24%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

75

28%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

19

39%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

14

40%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.