HARRIET TUBMAN CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

69

17%

LEVEL 2

116

28%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

99

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

112

27%

LEVEL 3

128

31%

LEVEL 4

145

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

54

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

53

23%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

91

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

45

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

61

33%

LEVEL 4

54

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

147
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

45

17%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

67

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

177
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

97

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

43

33%

LEVEL 4

31

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

45

33%

LEVEL 4

46

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

91

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

88

24%

LEVEL 3

115

32%

LEVEL 4

139

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

23

46%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

24

45%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

211
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

61

16%

LEVEL 2

103

27%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

97

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

264
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

104

27%

LEVEL 3

121

31%

LEVEL 4

143

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

28

33%

LEVEL 4

24

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

22

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

98

30%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

112

31%

LEVEL 4

123

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

205
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

61

16%

LEVEL 2

105

28%

LEVEL 3

112

30%

LEVEL 4

93

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.