Skip to Content
Main content

IS 339 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

254

56%

LEVEL 2

115

26%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

223

51%

LEVEL 2

123

28%

LEVEL 3

71

16%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

107

54%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

98

47%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

147

59%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

125

55%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

72

54%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

51

40%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

178

59%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

39

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

168

56%

LEVEL 2

72

24%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

197

53%

LEVEL 2

95

26%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

165

47%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

57

71%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

58

68%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

72
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

151

50%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

108

37%

LEVEL 2

103

35%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

103

70%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

115

80%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

17

52%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

238

57%

LEVEL 2

101

24%

LEVEL 3

58

14%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

206

51%

LEVEL 2

115

29%

LEVEL 3

63

16%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

198

58%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

43

13%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

67
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

169

51%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

56

52%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

54

53%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.