Skip to Content
Main content

IS 229 ROLAND PATTERSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

16
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

175

76%

LEVEL 2

38

17%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

172

75%

LEVEL 2

46

20%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

86

69%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

77

71%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

89

85%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

95

79%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

111

79%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

110

78%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

104

68%

LEVEL 2

32

21%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

114

72%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

71

92%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

58

83%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

132

72%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

138

73%

LEVEL 2

41

22%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

43

93%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

34

87%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

166

77%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

163

76%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

141

77%

LEVEL 2

28

15%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

134

74%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

34

76%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.