PS 236 LANGSTON HUGHES GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

37

31%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

24

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

20

30%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

16

21%

LEVEL 2

23

30%

LEVEL 3

23

30%

LEVEL 4

14

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

9

27%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

23

27%

LEVEL 2

31

37%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

19

19%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

18

20%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

29

33%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

19

59%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

16

57%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

38
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

32

30%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

58
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

26

21%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

24

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

11

55%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

34
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

30

31%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

54
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.