Skip to Content
Main content

PS/MS 4 CROTONA PARK WEST GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

108

36%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

121

40%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

54

36%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

61

43%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

67

45%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

61

38%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

53
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

66

40%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

45

33%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

64

28%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

84

35%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

44

61%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

37

59%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

89
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

91

34%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

85

35%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

17

45%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

36

62%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

100

36%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

111

40%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

61

31%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

70

36%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

47

44%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

51

47%

LEVEL 2

36

33%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.