Skip to Content
Main content

PS 130 ABRAM STEVENS HEWITT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

107

49%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

85

43%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

44

44%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

63

53%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

51

48%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

19

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

23

46%

LEVEL 2

18

36%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

82

50%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

55

39%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

55

36%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

34

25%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

29

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

52

76%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

51

80%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

54
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

59

38%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

56
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

50

34%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

48

74%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

35

67%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

98

51%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

79

46%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

50
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

87

48%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

53
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

69

41%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

20

50%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.