MS 101 EDWARD R BYRNE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

121

24%

LEVEL 2

128

26%

LEVEL 3

116

23%

LEVEL 4

134

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

313
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

89

17%

LEVEL 2

126

24%

LEVEL 3

133

25%

LEVEL 4

180

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

139
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

77

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

176
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

77

26%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

103

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

77

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

57
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

42

63%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

78
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

67

79%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

21

23%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

18

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

30

38%

LEVEL 4

19

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

17

34%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

13

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

11

21%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

18

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

120
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

79

28%

LEVEL 2

83

29%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

148
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

65

22%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

70

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

48

12%

LEVEL 2

102

26%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

129

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

91

22%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

176

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

73

65%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

60

50%

LEVEL 2

35

29%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

250
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

118

24%

LEVEL 2

125

25%

LEVEL 3

116

24%

LEVEL 4

134

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

312
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

87

17%

LEVEL 2

122

23%

LEVEL 3

132

25%

LEVEL 4

180

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

37

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

49

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

100

27%

LEVEL 2

99

27%

LEVEL 3

76

20%

LEVEL 4

97

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

218
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

70

18%

LEVEL 2

97

25%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

131

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

243
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

111

23%

LEVEL 2

123

26%

LEVEL 3

111

23%

LEVEL 4

132

28%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

306
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

86

17%

LEVEL 2

123

24%

LEVEL 3

130

25%

LEVEL 4

176

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.