JHS 123 JAMES M KIERNAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

175

56%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

184

50%

LEVEL 2

86

23%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

88

56%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

93

49%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

87

56%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

91

52%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

41

60%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

42

57%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

127

55%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

131

49%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

129

50%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

143

45%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

46

85%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

41

82%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

109

48%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

90
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

107

39%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

66

79%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

77

86%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

21

54%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

27

53%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

154

56%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

157

50%

LEVEL 2

80

25%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

135

55%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

80
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

131

47%

LEVEL 2

67

24%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

40

59%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

53

60%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.