Skip to Content
Main content

PS 36 UNIONPORT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

65

20%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

59

18%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

63

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

35

20%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

53

33%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

36

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

44
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

24

36%

LEVEL 4

20

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

51
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

29

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

81
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

90

36%

LEVEL 4

51

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

60

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

23

35%

LEVEL 2

29

45%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

21

33%

LEVEL 2

29

46%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

147
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

151
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

48

17%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

60

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

14

41%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

18

45%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

11

17%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

13

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

16

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

134
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

151
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

13

35%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.