JHS 151 LOU GEHRIG GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

190

78%

LEVEL 2

40

16%

LEVEL 3

12

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

158

72%

LEVEL 2

40

18%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

92

79%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

82

71%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

98

78%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

76

73%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

44

71%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

33

63%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

140

80%

LEVEL 2

25

14%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

122

76%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

136

72%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

111

67%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

54

98%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

47

87%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

118

77%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

96

67%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

72

81%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

62

82%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

141

82%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

102

72%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

49

69%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

56

73%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.