Skip to Content
Main content

PS 157 GROVE HILL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

86

31%

LEVEL 2

99

36%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

93

34%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

40

29%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

43

35%

LEVEL 2

48

39%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

46

34%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

50

33%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

30

36%

LEVEL 2

33

40%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

36

39%

LEVEL 2

37

40%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

55

32%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

51

25%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

62

29%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

35

52%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

31

52%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

84
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

74

30%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

76
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

81

33%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

12

39%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

85

33%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

91

35%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

81
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

65

28%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

73
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

87

39%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

21

53%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

29

58%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.