Skip to Content
Main content

PS 5 PORT MORRIS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

244

58%

LEVEL 2

111

26%

LEVEL 3

60

14%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

214

50%

LEVEL 2

128

30%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

107

54%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

92

46%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

137

61%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

122

54%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

74

64%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

62

54%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

162

56%

LEVEL 2

76

26%

LEVEL 3

46

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

144

49%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

171

51%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

145

43%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

59

17%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

73

85%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

69

81%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

53
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

176

55%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

69
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

150

47%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

68

66%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

64

58%

LEVEL 2

31

28%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

239

59%

LEVEL 2

105

26%

LEVEL 3

56

14%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

209

51%

LEVEL 2

122

30%

LEVEL 3

62

15%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

55
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

190

57%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

69
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

169

50%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

54

61%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

45

50%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.