PS 30 WILTON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

139

52%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

150

58%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

74

52%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

73

55%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

65

53%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

77

61%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

26

55%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

39

71%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

108

53%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

104

54%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

104

50%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

111

55%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

35

60%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

39

68%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

47
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

96

45%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

41
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

109

52%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

43

78%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

41

80%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

129

52%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

143

58%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

40
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

109

51%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

108

56%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

30

58%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

42

63%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.