Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 187 HUDSON CLIFFS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

124

29%

LEVEL 3

129

30%

LEVEL 4

105

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

97

23%

LEVEL 3

135

32%

LEVEL 4

136

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

49

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

70

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

56

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

66

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

8

53%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

13

68%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

11

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

25

17%

LEVEL 3

58

40%

LEVEL 4

54

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

69

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

90
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

60

25%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

111
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

41

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

100

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

74

21%

LEVEL 3

116

34%

LEVEL 4

129

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

37

46%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

30

38%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

234
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

115

28%

LEVEL 3

129

31%

LEVEL 4

105

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

271
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

43

11%

LEVEL 2

92

23%

LEVEL 3

135

33%

LEVEL 4

136

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

50

22%

LEVEL 3

80

35%

LEVEL 4

83

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

33

14%

LEVEL 3

82

35%

LEVEL 4

96

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

59

29%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

40

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

229
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

119

28%

LEVEL 3

128

31%

LEVEL 4

101

24%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

263
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

54

13%

LEVEL 2

90

22%

LEVEL 3

130

32%

LEVEL 4

133

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.