Skip to Content
Main content

PS 189 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

143

37%

LEVEL 2

126

32%

LEVEL 3

83

21%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

91

26%

LEVEL 2

114

33%

LEVEL 3

94

27%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

73

36%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

70

38%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

41

26%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

114
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

138

37%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

134
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

88

27%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

89

27%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

113

34%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

68

23%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

30

56%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

23

42%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

106
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

60

23%

LEVEL 2

99

37%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

126
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

83

66%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

45

51%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

137

38%

LEVEL 2

113

32%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

88

27%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

85

26%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

117
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

129

36%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

79

22%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

132
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.