Skip to Content
Main content

PS 98 SHORAC KAPPOCK GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

114

53%

LEVEL 2

41

19%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

87

45%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

39

41%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

15

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

30

34%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

75

63%

LEVEL 2

18

15%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

57

54%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

107

54%

LEVEL 2

40

20%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

83

47%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

80

46%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

56

37%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

34

87%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

31

78%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

46

36%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

25

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

56
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

35

30%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

23

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

68

78%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

52

68%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

109

55%

LEVEL 2

38

19%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

83

47%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

90

53%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

55
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

61

40%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

24

55%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.