Skip to Content
Main content

PS 152 DYCKMAN VALLEY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

108

41%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

87

34%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

43

34%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

40

34%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

65

46%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

47

34%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

75
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

104

41%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

70

33%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

56

27%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

38

69%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

31

65%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

47

27%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

76
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

49

27%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

61

69%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

38

50%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

80

34%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

57

40%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

54

34%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

51

42%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

33

34%

LEVEL 2

37

38%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.