Skip to Content
Main content

PS 48 PO MICHAEL J BUCZEK GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

117

45%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

89

38%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

56

48%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

36

35%

LEVEL 2

31

30%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

61

43%

LEVEL 2

53

38%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

53

40%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

112

46%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

85

39%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

51

29%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

41

62%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

38

67%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

69

38%

LEVEL 2

73

40%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

64
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

48

65%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

40

57%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

111

45%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

83

38%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

105

47%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

55
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

77

40%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

12

33%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.