Skip to Content
Main content

HAROLD O LEVY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

131

57%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

145

67%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

62

59%

LEVEL 2

31

30%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

79

72%

LEVEL 2

19

17%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

69

56%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

66

61%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

122

56%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

137

66%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

99

54%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

110

65%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

32

73%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

35

71%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

24
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

51

41%

LEVEL 2

48

39%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

41

41%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

80

75%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

104

89%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

127

57%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

140

67%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

104

56%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

112

64%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

27

61%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

33

79%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.