Skip to Content
Main content

PS 206 JOSE CELSO BARBOSA GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

174

49%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

57

16%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

136

40%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

66

19%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

79

49%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

65

42%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

95

48%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

71

38%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

56

57%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

33

41%

LEVEL 2

33

41%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

110

47%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

95

39%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

92

39%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

53

24%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

82

68%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

75

63%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

82
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

131

45%

LEVEL 2

79

27%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

105

38%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

43

65%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

31

46%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

17

38%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

20

35%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

157

50%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

116

40%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

79
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

140

46%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

107

37%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

34

62%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

29

57%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.