Skip to Content
Main content

PS 7 SAMUEL STERN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

87

46%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

88

39%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

46

48%

LEVEL 2

24

25%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

32

32%

LEVEL 2

36

36%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

41

44%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

56

44%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

30

57%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

35

49%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

52

43%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

48

35%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

61

41%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

26

67%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

38

79%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

48
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

75

45%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

69
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

74

36%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

79

46%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

79

39%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

39
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

75

50%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

74

41%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

14

31%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.