JAMES WELDON JOHNSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

235

47%

LEVEL 2

170

34%

LEVEL 3

73

15%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

247

51%

LEVEL 2

129

26%

LEVEL 3

80

16%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

121

49%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

118

48%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

114

46%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

129

53%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

77

60%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

77

62%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

150

44%

LEVEL 2

130

38%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

159

48%

LEVEL 2

94

28%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

143

37%

LEVEL 2

154

40%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

150

41%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

92

81%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

97

79%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

92
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

208

45%

LEVEL 2

164

35%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

106
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

208

47%

LEVEL 2

125

28%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

27

79%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

39

78%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

22

35%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

23

38%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

213

49%

LEVEL 2

146

34%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

224

52%

LEVEL 2

108

25%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

77
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

172

44%

LEVEL 2

138

36%

LEVEL 3

64

17%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

88
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

190

50%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

63

57%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

57

52%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.