LEXINGTON ACADEMY (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

171

45%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

54

14%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

158

41%

LEVEL 2

127

33%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

90

49%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

71

38%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

81

42%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

87

44%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

28

50%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

32

46%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

137

45%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

120

41%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

117

40%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

102

34%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

54

67%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

56

66%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

141

42%

LEVEL 2

128

38%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

95
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

139

39%

LEVEL 2

119

34%

LEVEL 3

65

18%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

30

81%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

19

63%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

19

45%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

158

46%

LEVEL 2

124

36%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

139

41%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

124

43%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

79
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

121

41%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

47

55%

LEVEL 2

30

35%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

37

42%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.