Skip to Content
Main content

PS 165 ROBERT E SIMON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

132

40%

LEVEL 2

75

23%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

53

27%

LEVEL 2

34

17%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

60

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

67

40%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

26

26%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

31

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

65

40%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

29

30%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

21

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

25

63%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

25

52%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

96

44%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

45

35%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

23

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

87

32%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

63

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

58

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

45

75%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

21

66%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

110
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

66

24%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

64

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

57

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

36

63%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

19

23%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

37

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

38

67%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

113

46%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

101
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

102

39%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

99
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

58

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

30

45%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.