Skip to Content
Main content

PS 166 RICHARD ROGERS-ARTS & SCI GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

22

8%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

193

72%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

16

6%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

206

77%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

90

66%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

111

77%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

103

77%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

95

77%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

21

95%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

24

89%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

33

92%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

31

91%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

10

6%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

118

74%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

128

82%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

18

47%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

20

49%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

15

6%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

182

78%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

10

4%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

196

81%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

11

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

10

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

177

83%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

182

82%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

16

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

24

50%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.