JHS 54 BOOKER T WASHINGTON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

519
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

42

7%

LEVEL 3

73

12%

LEVEL 4

446

74%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

512
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

52

9%

LEVEL 2

34

6%

LEVEL 3

75

13%

LEVEL 4

437

73%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

272
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

27

9%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

228

74%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

287
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

19

6%

LEVEL 3

41

13%

LEVEL 4

246

77%

MALE

PROFICIENT

247
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

15

5%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

218

75%

MALE

PROFICIENT

225
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

15

5%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

191

68%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

56
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

52

91%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

65
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

59

88%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

60

90%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

321
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

283

84%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

312
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

8

2%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

267

82%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

17

17%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

14

14%

LEVEL 4

53

54%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

28

31%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

41

45%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

498
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

28

5%

LEVEL 3

67

13%

LEVEL 4

431

81%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

482
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

22

4%

LEVEL 3

62

12%

LEVEL 4

420

82%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

37

51%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

15

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

46

52%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

518
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

37

6%

LEVEL 2

40

7%

LEVEL 3

73

12%

LEVEL 4

445

75%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

512
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

47

8%

LEVEL 2

33

6%

LEVEL 3

75

13%

LEVEL 4

437

74%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

456
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

14

3%

LEVEL 3

54

11%

LEVEL 4

402

85%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

437
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

17

4%

LEVEL 3

56

12%

LEVEL 4

381

82%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

35

28%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

44

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

40

30%

LEVEL 2

17

13%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

56

42%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

516
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

41

7%

LEVEL 3

71

12%

LEVEL 4

445

75%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

509
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

46

8%

LEVEL 2

34

6%

LEVEL 3

75

13%

LEVEL 4

434

74%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.