PS 183 ROBERT L STEVENSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

26

11%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

137

58%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

21

9%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

154

66%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

68

56%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

67

63%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

35

30%

LEVEL 4

69

59%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

87

69%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

7

78%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

34

83%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

33

87%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

90

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

100

64%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

11

50%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

11

48%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

6%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

125

66%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

139

73%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

18

37%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

15

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

199
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

26

11%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

135

59%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

198
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

19

9%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

148

67%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

78%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

6

55%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

123

58%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

136

68%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

14

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

18

55%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.