IS 289 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

103

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

107

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

54

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

20

17%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

53

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

49

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

54

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

101
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

70

59%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

101
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

35

27%

LEVEL 4

66

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

35

37%

LEVEL 4

26

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

27

36%

LEVEL 4

29

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

14

47%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

13

35%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

39

19%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

98

48%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

103

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

8

16%

LEVEL 2

23

45%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

15

35%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

179
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

102

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

184
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

44

18%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

105

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

43

35%

LEVEL 4

43

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

45

37%

LEVEL 4

48

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

60

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

59

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

169
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

94

39%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

171
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

46

19%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

94

39%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

9

69%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

13

72%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.