PS 116 MARY LINDLEY MURRAY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

41

17%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

78

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

72

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

43

35%

LEVEL 4

38

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

19

18%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

32

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

17

15%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

40

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

40

44%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

27

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

30

68%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

36

38%

LEVEL 4

37

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

28

34%

LEVEL 4

30

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

15

34%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

15

34%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

69

36%

LEVEL 4

76

39%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

70

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

146
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

36

17%

LEVEL 3

75

35%

LEVEL 4

71

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

130
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

70

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

24

16%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

70

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

63

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

31

36%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

29

34%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

27

40%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

20

30%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

77

36%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

128
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

30

17%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

71

39%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.