Skip to Content
Main content

PS 124 YUNG WING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

26

8%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

186

58%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

184

65%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

92

61%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

45

33%

LEVEL 4

81

59%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

14

8%

LEVEL 3

60

35%

LEVEL 4

94

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

7%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

103

72%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

279
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

23

7%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

179

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

248
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

19

7%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

175

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

17

6%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

176

60%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

16

6%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

172

68%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

10

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

12

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

240
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

15

6%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

168

66%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

225
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

15

6%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

169

70%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

33

49%

LEVEL 4

18

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

34
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

19

46%

LEVEL 4

15

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

7%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

87

64%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

87

71%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

16

9%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

99

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

97

61%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

279
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

25

8%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

178

57%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

245
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

20

7%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

172

64%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

8

62%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

12

80%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.