Skip to Content
Main content

PS 59 BEEKMAN HILL INTERNATIONAL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

30

12%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

143

57%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

21

8%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

159

60%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

79

63%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

78

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

64

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

81

63%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

13

62%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

19

70%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

35

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

45

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

84

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

11

7%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

82

55%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

10

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

11

41%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

24

12%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

128

62%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

145

67%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

15

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

14

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

195
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

24

10%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

136

59%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

208
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

149

62%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

10

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

24

11%

LEVEL 3

53

24%

LEVEL 4

136

61%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

194
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

13

6%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

138

62%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

7

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

21

50%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.