PS 126 JACOB AUGUST RIIS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

51

12%

LEVEL 2

72

17%

LEVEL 3

91

21%

LEVEL 4

213

50%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

43

11%

LEVEL 2

60

15%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

214

55%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

102

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

106

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

43

18%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

111

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

31

15%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

108

54%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

238
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

29

10%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

172

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

229
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

27

10%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

179

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

27

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

18

72%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

16

48%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

23

37%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

46

13%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

208

59%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

42

13%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

205

65%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

31

42%

LEVEL 2

26

36%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

35

47%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

273
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

52

14%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

205

57%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

263
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

45

13%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

206

61%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

31
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

15

23%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

23

35%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

23
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

70

75%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

69

78%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

221
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

64

19%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

143

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

209
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

52

17%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

145

48%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

236
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

168

50%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

212
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

45

15%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

164

56%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

68
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

11

12%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

45

48%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

24

25%

LEVEL 4

50

53%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.