PS 40 AUGUSTUS SAINT-GAUDENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

24

9%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

178

63%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

30

11%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

159

58%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

94

63%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

85

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

12

9%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

84

64%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

74

59%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

18

56%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

22

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

20

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

14

8%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

119

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

15

9%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

103

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

17

52%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

12

31%

LEVEL 4

16

41%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

14

6%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

160

70%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

14

6%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

144

66%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

18

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

21

37%

LEVEL 4

15

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

246
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

21

8%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

176

64%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

233
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

27

10%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

157

59%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

225
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

20

8%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

160

63%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

25

10%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

147

61%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

18

62%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

12

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.