Skip to Content
Main content

PS 3 CHARRETTE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

43

15%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

128

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

40

14%

LEVEL 3

97

34%

LEVEL 4

131

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

19

13%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

63

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

24

16%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

64

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

65

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

67

48%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

14

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

20

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

89

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

19

11%

LEVEL 3

65

37%

LEVEL 4

83

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

8

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

8

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

15

42%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

27

12%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

121

52%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

27

12%

LEVEL 3

79

34%

LEVEL 4

119

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

16

27%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

213
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

41

15%

LEVEL 3

87

32%

LEVEL 4

126

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

218
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

35

13%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

126

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

107

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

22

10%

LEVEL 3

71

32%

LEVEL 4

117

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

21

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

26

38%

LEVEL 4

14

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.