Skip to Content
Main content

PS 34 FRANKLIN D ROOSEVELT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

121

55%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

112

58%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

57

52%

LEVEL 2

36

33%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

53

57%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

64

58%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

59

58%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

45

63%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

46

70%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

69

54%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

58

53%

LEVEL 2

43

39%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

67

46%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

62

48%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

54

72%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

50

77%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

35
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

104

51%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

102

56%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

17

89%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

120

56%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

89

51%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

85

56%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

32

67%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

27

63%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.